CHRONOFRAME
Butternuts were found at the Norse site in Newfoundland. The trees that grow them have never grown there.
Some of the most important evidence at L'Anse aux Meadows is also the smallest. Among the finds from the Norse site were remains of butternuts, the nuts of a North American tree also called white walnut. They tell us something the buildings alone cannot: the Norse did not stop in Newfoundland.
A nut out of place
Butternut trees do not grow in Newfoundland, and as far as botanists know, they never have. The species reaches its northern limit far to the south and west, around the Gulf of St. Lawrence and in New Brunswick. The nearest place the Norse could have gathered butternuts was hundreds of miles from the site where they were found.
Butternuts are not light enough to drift that far on their own, and animals do not carry them such distances. The simplest explanation is that people picked them up in the south and brought them back to the camp. Excavators also found a piece of butternut wood that had been worked with a tool, which supports the idea of Norse visits to butternut country.
A base, not the destination
This changes how historians read the site. L'Anse aux Meadows was small and lived in only for a short time. It has no farm fields and no barns for animals. It does have workshops for repairing boats. Many researchers, including archaeologist Birgitta Wallace of Parks Canada, have argued that it served as a gateway: a base where crews spent the winter and repaired their ships before heading south to explore and gather resources.
The butternuts suggest where those trips went. The same southern region around the Gulf of St. Lawrence is also where wild grapes grow, and the sagas say that Leif Erikson named Vinland after grapes. If that is right, the Newfoundland site was the doorway to Vinland rather than Vinland itself.
What we still do not know
No Norse site has yet been found farther south, so the routes and landing places of these voyages are still unknown. The evidence is indirect: a few nutshells and a piece of worked wood. But it is physical evidence, and it fits closely with what the sagas describe.
It is a reminder that archaeology often rests on small things. A sword or a carved stone draws attention, but a handful of shells from a tree that should not be there can tell a clearer story about where people went and what they found.
Watch this story as a short film on our Facebook page. Scenes in our films are AI reconstructions; the history is real.